Correlations Of Gratitude And Forgiveness Psychology Essay

Correlations Of Gratitude And lenity Psychology EssayGratitude has further been focused inwardly the field of psychology in the past go although historically it had been discussed at length in theology, religion and philosophy (Emmons McCullough, 2003). feeling back a little into the past, great philosophers such(prenominal) as Aristotle, Epicurus and La Rochefoucauld were convinced that manifestations of gratitude were due to human beings ego interest and messy delirious ties that make people unnecessarily beholden to their benefactors (Harpham, 2000 Roberts, 2000 as cited in McCullough, Emmons, Tsang, 2002). only when this topic was reintroduced into the field of scientific studies, investigateers atomic number 18 convince that gratitude has associations with more than affirmative out deducts than the ostracizes (Naito, Wangwan Tani, 2005 Wood, Joseph, Linley, 2007 Froh, Yurkewicz Kashdan, 2009). agree to McCullough, Emmons, Tsang (2002), gratitude like other r eachs could exist as an affective trait, an sensation or feeling which they called gratitude appetency. It is soulfulnesss universal predisposition to distinguish and act in response with gratifying feeling to the litigates of those whom provides confirming meets and outcomes. Other scholars working on dispositional gratitude believes that it is interrelate to a more optimistic and enthusiastic attitude toward animateness (Wood, Jospeh Maltby, 2008 Froh, Yurkewicz Kashdan, 2009). There ar four facets (otherwise known as ele handsts) that influence ones gratitude disposition known as intensity, frequency, span and density which co-occurs.The first facet of gratitude disposition is intensity that dope be measure by level of thankfulness one feels upon the occurrence of affirmatory event. An singular whom is dispositionally pleasurable will experience greater intensity of gladness as compared to a soul whom is less(prenominal) disposed out of the same despotic event. Frequency, the second facet can be defined as the number of times an respective(prenominal) feels grateful within an allocated period. Dispositionally grateful individual in general will under bring through experiencing more grateful events a day as compared to their counterparts. Their gratitude might be cause by even the smallest favor or act of adroitness (McCullough, Emmons Tsang, 2002).Gratitude span (the third facet) is, at a given timeframe, the number of brio circumstances a person feels grateful for. A dispositionally grateful individual will definitely look at more appreciation aspects such as feeling grateful about their families, jobs, friends and even simply living demeanor itself. The last facet of gratitude disposition is density which is reflected by the number of persons an individual feels grateful for a single peremptory outcome. If a dispositionally grateful person is ask who they appreciate for obtaining level-headed exam results, the list may overwhe lm many significant others such as parents, teachers, friends, neighbours, siblings (McCullough, Emmons Tsang, 2002).ForgivenessForgiveness is an action plausibly to draw two or more individuals, namely the offender and victim closer together as human is universally allow as a kindly act. No doubt that mounting queryes on cle handscy had been carried out yet scholars are more readily to book upon what forbearance is not (McCullough, Parga custodyt Thoresen, 2000). Many of them are convinced that pardon should be separated from justifying, pardoning, condoning and reconciliation (Rye, Loiacono, Folck, Olszewski, Heim Madia, 2001 Worthingon, Witvliet, Pietrini Miller, 2007 Fincham, 2010). Even until present the precise definition of amnesty and how to measure it remains an open discussion among psychologists.Rye, Loiacono, Folck, Olszewski, Heim Madia (2001) had compartmentalized benevolence into two factors called the Absence of Negativity (AN) and the Presence of ad vantageousness (PP). Absence of electronegativeness is measured by negative opinions, affections and action tendencies (disparaging thinking, anger and desire to debar or retaliate against the offender) one holds towards individual that wronged them. On the other hand, aim of positivity is the extent whereby individuals have love and compassion towards their offenders as comfortably as carrying out cordial action tendencies toward them (Rye et al., 2001).Despite years of research on this character strength psychologists are still unable to come to an agreement whether one or some(prenominal) factors are necessary in the measure of ones grace. Some forgiveness scholars are convinced that absence of negative affect is largely sufficient to define the forgiveness process (Fincham, 2010) others insisted that it is not adequate as they trust experiencing positive affects toward ones transgressor is a critical detail in completely forgiving someone (Edwards et al., 2002 Kearns Fi ncham, 2005). Romig and Veenstra (1998) pointed out that individuals ability to disband developmental tasks from Eriksons Psychosocial developmental stages requires both Absence of Negativity (AN) and the Presence of Positivity (PP) in their forgiveness (as cited in Scherbarth, 2007).Worthington (2005) had another interesting explanation mentioning that individuals forgiveness towards strangers is just reducing negative responses but eliminating unforgiveness will be replaced with the positive affects if offender is someone involving family members, colleagues and friends. He suggested that presence of positive affects is only applicable in situations where victim knows the transgressors (Worthington, 2005). In one way or another, touchstone forgiveness through these two factors (AN PP) has gained its popularity among psychologists researching this strength. sexual activity differences in Gratitude and Forgiveness sexuality differences are an interesting part in the studies of af fective traits including gratitude and forgiveness. enquiryers back in the 1990s had begun this research with a broader aspect known as value orientation. Beutel and Marini (1995) advocate that women tend to show apparent gratitude towards interpersonal relationships while men are likely to values competition and materialism. Eisenberg Fabes (1998) showed depict in their write up titled Prosocial Development that women are more empathic than men, suggesting them to be more people oriented as compared to counterparts. Although both sex activitys display gratitude in casual liveliness, women are believed to be more expressive when it comes to emotions like gratefulness. This besides influences them to report experiencing indebtedness more intensely and frequently (Simon Nath, 2004 Gordon, Musher-Eizenman, Holub Dalrymp, 2004 Naito, Wangwan Tani, 2005).A research conducted by Kashdan, Mishra, Breen Froh (2009) had some interesting findings about this topic. They make up that women evaluated gratitude to be more interesting and exciting as compared to men, whom reported greater burden and obligation with lesser gratitude upon receiving a gift or favor from others. Besides that, men alike mentioned that positive affects will be lesser if their benefactors were of same gender. accord to Adetunji Adesida (2008), men may interpret expressions of gratitude as a sign of picture and weakness, which is believe to threaten their masculinity and social reputation. Furthermore, women with extravagantlyer gratitude are more likely to experience sovereign and fulfilling their belonging needs but men on the other hand may feel vice versa should they submit greater gratitude (Kashdan, Mishra, Breen Froh, 2009).Moving on to forgiveness, Miller, Worthington Mcdaniel (2008) conducted a meta-analytical review on gender differences and forgiveness for 70 researches relating to this theme. The result obtained supported that females are more forgiving as compared to males. The highly possible explanation is that females are prone to be less vengeful as compared to males (Brown, 2004 McCullough, Bellah, Kilpatrick Johnson, 2001). Men are commonly boost taking justice into their own hands but women are likely to be taught relationship harmony (Miller, Worthington Mcdaniel, 2008). This example is common among the Western people whom profoundly observe masculinity and feminine theory in their daily life.However in contrary, Kmiec (2009) had different findings to offer. He found that there were no gender differences in terms of general forgiveness but men were more likely to forgive in recalling a specific hap. He justified when both genders are equal in overall forgiveness, men are less detailed in recalling a particular incident that lead to unforgiveness. Females on the other hand may recall thoughts which they had worry in forgiving the offender, even though this does not reflect their normal model of forgiving (Kmiec, 2009). Fehr, Gelf and Nag (2010) also duplicated similar result support that gender does not differ in terms of forgiveness by and by analyzing 76 studies containing 11730 participants (r Correlations of Gratitude and ForgivenessGratitude and forgiveness in modern years had been scientifically proven to have associations that enhance improve living among individuals and community at large. Sufficient researches had convinced scholars that both gratitude (Froh, Yurkewicz Kashdan, 2009) and forgiveness (Lawler-Row Piferi, 2006 Ysseldyk, Matheson Anisman, 2007) do correlates in predicting individual subjective intumesce being. Both character strengths are further identify as the sources of interpersonal and intrapersonal strengths that nurse a wellnessy bodily and mental environment.Experimental data confirms that gratitude and forgiveness are positively correlated with optimistic, life blisss (Sastre, Vinsonneau, Neto, Girard Mullet, 2003), physical health (Levenson, Aldwin Yancura, 2006 W orthingon, Witvliet, Pietrini Miller, 2007) and environmental mastery (Wood, Joseph Linley, 2007 Hill Allemand, 2010). In contrary, grateful and forgiving individuals are negatively correlated with pessimistic affect such as filter out, anxiety and depression (Berry, Worthington, OConnor, Parrott Wade, 2005 Eaton, Struthers, Santelli, 2006 Wood, Maltby, Gillet, Linley Joseph, 2008 Tse Yip, 2009 Gavian, 2011).A recent research make by Froh, Fan, Emmons, Bono, Huebner Watkins (2011) supported that individuals that regularly experience gratitude in life are more likely to enjoy erupt well being and agelong life satisfaction because they are more capable in adjusting to their positive social environment. This idea was built on preliminary research by McCullough, Kilpatrick, Emmons Larson (2001) highlighting that gratitude emotion essentially serve as a (1) good barometer, motivating individuals to be sensitive towards the help they receive daily, (2) moral pay back functi on that inspire grateful individual to behave prosocially towards others and (3) moral reenforcement function which cultivates benefactors future moral behaviors.Besides that, Allemand, Hill, Ghaemmaghami Martin (2012) had also extended previous findings by using future time perspective as a moderating factor in examining adults forgiveness and subjective well being. They found out that individuals whom believe of having limited future time portray stronger positive association amidst forgiveness and well being. However the moderating stamp does not apply for negative affect and pessimism. The discrepancy obtained indicates that positive affect and negative affect (Lucas, Diener Suh, 1996) as well as optimism and pessimism (Herzberg et al., 2006) are not direct opposite characteristics as suggested in preceding studies.Other than focalisation solely on non clinical samples, years worth of experiments also cut to induce both psychologists and medical practitioners to consider that suitable gratitude (Ng Wong, 2013 Joseph Wood, 2010 Wood Tarrier, 2010 Chan, 2008) and forgiveness (Witvliet, Ludwing Laan, 2001 Worthington Scherer, 2004 Carson et. al., 2005 Friedman Toussaint, 2006) interventions will be beneficial towards physically and psychologically ill clients. By adopting gratitude and forgiveness as strength based interventions in helping clinical settings clients to cope with their sicknesses had been verified to be as effective as breathing problem focused interventions.For instance Toussaint et. al. (2010) managed to establish that fibromyalgia and chronic fatigues patients showed signs of improvements by and by learning the art of forgiving during their treatment periods. This is because fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue symptoms are aggravated by patients frustration, anger, stress and fear (Raymond Brown, 2000). Forgiveness is found to be a coping mechanism that will alleviate the exacerbating exercise of negative emotional reactions th erefrom offering a cure towards these sicknesses (Toussaint et. al., 2010). This favorable outcome was earlier acknowledged by Carson, Keefe, Lynch, Carson, Goli, Fras Trop (2005) mentioning that focusing on positive affects in life instead of thinking about failures in treating unwellness may be beneficial towards chronic fatigue patients because the sickness is part convoluted by anger, antipathy and stress as stated above.An elegant supporting reason why gratitude and forgiveness are subjective well being booster and effective clinical interventions is because individuals with these character strengths are also equipped with positive emotional attributions such empathy, self compassion and bridal (Breen, Kashdan, Lenser Finchman, 2010). Several studies advocate gratitude (McCullough Hoyt, 2002) and forgiveness (Brown, 2003 Paleari, Regalia Fincham, 2005) to positively correlates with both cognitive (scenario attributions) and affective (feeling the victims emotion) aspects of empathy. Grateful and forgiving individuals are prone to understand others better by analyzing situations from others point of views which circuitously improve their social supports and interpersonal relationship.Besides empathy, self compassion also reflects an individuals warmth and perspective taking towards self and others. According to Werner, Jazaieri, Goldin, Ziv, Heimberg Gross (2012), self compassion can be defined as the talent to hold a kind and non-judgmental perspective of oneself and be certain of the similarities between self and others. According to Fehr, Gelfand Nag (2010), self compassion within the context of forgiveness is seen to enhance victims perceptive of why their offenders might have affronted them. This will indirectly reduce their urge for vengeance and anger hence improves the likelihood of forgiveness to occur. The ultimate outcome of these individuals would be healthier physical and better recovery from sickness due to the reduction in inessen tial stress and anger.Lastly, acceptance which is known as individuals willingness in opening up to experiences, thoughts, feelings, physical sensations as well as life events also prove to show indirect relations with gratitude and forgiveness (Breen, Kashdan, Lenser Finchman, 2010). Acceptance provides individuals a broadcast to respond accordingly to situational demands by fully experiencing every occurring event. By having high level of acceptance individual will be sensitive towards the good deed others had done for them that indirectly elevate their gratitude level. On the other hand, forgiveness and acceptance are related in the direction of embracing negative events while responding with objectivity and litheness. Both of these character strengths will then foster good resiliency for individuals to cope with difficult, unsuspected downturn in life.In short, gratitude and forgiveness may oblige discrete attributions (McCullough, Emmons Tsang, 2002) but share a common conc eptually linked as positively valence, portraying empathic characters that is associated with both psychological and physical health. It is strongly believed that literatures presented here are both promising and convincing for current research to focus in exploring the correlations between gratitude and forgiveness within same Asian sample group.References 2.4Wong, W. S., Ng, M. Y. (2013). The differential effects of gratitude and sleep on psychological distress in patients with chronic pain. daybook of Health Psychology, 18(2), 263-271. inside 10.1177/1359105312439733Ysseldyk, R., Matheson, K., Anisman, H. (2007). Rumination Bridging a gap between forgiveness, vindictiveness and psychological health. disposition and Individual Dierences, 42, 1573-1584. inside10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.032Lawler-Row, K. A., Piferi, R. L. (2006). The forgiving personality Describing a life well lived? genius and Individual Dierences, 41, 1009-1020. inside10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.007Sastre, M. T. M ., Vinsonneau, G., Neto, F., Girard, M., Mullet, E. (2003). Forgivingness and satisfaction with life. daybook of Happiness Studies, 4, 323-335. Retrieved from http//www.unice.fr/lasmic/PDF/girard-article-4.pdfLevenson, M. R., Aldwin, C. M., Yancura, L. (2006). Positive emotional change Mediating effects of forgiveness and spirituality. Journal of Science and Healing, 2(6), 498-508. inside10.1016/j.explore.2006.08.002Hill, P., Allemand, M. (2010). Forgivingness and adult patterns of individual differences in environmental mastery and personal growth. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 245-250. inside10.1016/j.jrp.2010.01.006Berry, J. W., Worthington, E. L., Jr., OConnor, L. E., Parrott, L., III, Wade, N. G.(2005). Forgivingness, vengeful reflection, and affective traits. Journal of Personality, 73(1), 183-226. inside 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00308.xEaton, J., Structhers, C. W., Santelli, A. G. (2006). Dispositional and state forgiveness The business office of self-esteem , need for structure, and narcissism. Personality and Individual Dierences, 41, 371-380. inside10.1016/j.paid.2006.02.005Tse, W. S., Yip, T. H. J. (2009). Relationship among dispositional forgiveness of others, interpersonal adjustment and psychological well-being Implication for interpersonal theory of depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 365-368. DOI10.1016/j.paid.2008.11.001Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Gillett, R., Linley, P. A., Joseph, S. (2008). The role of gratitude in the development of social support, stress and depression Two longitudinal studies. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 854-871. DOI10.1016/j.jrp.2007.11.003Froh, J. J., Fan, J., Emmons, R. A., Bono, G., Huebner, E. S., Watkins, P. (2011). Measuring gratitude in youth Assessing the psychometric properties of adult gratitude scales in pincerren and adolescents. mental Assessment. Advance online publication. DOI 10.1037/a0021590McCullough, M. E., Kilpatrick, S. D., Emmons, R. A., Larson, D . B. (2001). Is gratitude a moral affect? Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 249-266. DOI 10.1037//0033-2909.127.2.249Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant inclemency of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 616-628. Retrieved from http//nreilly.asp.radford.edu/psy650/discriminant%20validity%20of%20well%20being%20measures.pdfHerzberg, P. Y., Glaesmer, H., Hoyer, J. (2006). Separating optimism andpessimism A full-bodied psychometric analysis of the Revised Life-OrientationTest (LOT-R). Psychological Assessment, 18, 433-438. DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.18.4.433Chan, D. W. (2008). Gratitude interventions beyond stress debriefing and survivor therapy in the aftermath of the Sichuan earthquake. Educational Research Journal, 23(2), 163-178. Retrieved from http//hkier.fed.cuhk.edu.hk/journal/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/erj_v23n2_163-178.pdfJoseph, S., Wood, A. (2010). Assessment of positive functioning in clinical psychology Theoretical and p ractical issues. clinical Psychology Review, 30, 830-838. DOI10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.002Wood, A. M., Tarrier, N. (2010). Positive clinical psychology A new vision and strategy for integrated research and practice. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 819-829. DOI10.1016/j.cpr.2010.06.003Witvliet, C. O., Ludwig, T. E., Laan, K. L. V. (2001). Granting forgiveness or harboring grudges Implications for emotion, physiology and health. Psychological Science, 12(2), 117-123. Retrieved from http//greatergood.berkeley.edu/images/uploads/VanOyenWitvliet-GrantingForgiveness.pdfWorthington, E. L., Scherer, M. (2004). Forgiveness is an emotion-focused coping strategy that can reduce health risks and promote health resilience Theory, review and hypotheses. Psychology and Health, 19(3), 385-405. DOI 10.1080/0887044042000196674Toussaint, L., Overvold-Ronningen, M., Vincent, A., Luedtke, C., Whipple, M., Schriever, T., Luskin, F. (2010). Implications of forgiveness enhancement in patients with Fibromya lgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, 16(3), 123-139. DOI 10.1080/08854726.2010.492713Friedman, P. H., Toussaint, L. (2006). Changes in forgiveness, gratitude, stress and well being during psychotherapy An integrative, evidence-based approach. Wholistic Healing Publication, 6(2), 1-21. Retrieved from http//www.academia.edu/1007794/Changes_in_forgiveness_gratitude_stress_and_well-being_during_psychotherapy_An_integrative_evidence-based_approachMcCullough, M. E., Hoyt, W. T. (2002). Transgression-related motivational dispositions Personality substrates of forgiveness and their links to the Big Five. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(11), 1556-1573. DOI 10.1177/014616702237583Brown, R. P. (2003). Measuring individual differences in the tendency to forgive Construct validity and links with depression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(6), 759-771. DOI 10.1177/0146167203029006008Paleari, F. G., Regalia, C., Fincham, F. (2005). Marital quality, forgiveness, empathy and rumination A longitudinal analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(3), 368-378. DOI 10.1177/0146167204271597Werner, K. H., Jazaieri, H., Goldin, P. R., Ziv, M., Heimberg, R. G., Gross, J. J. (2012). self-importance compassion and social anxiety disorder. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 25(5), 543-558. DOI10.1080/10615806.2011.608842Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and fealty therapyAn experimental approach to behavior change. New York Guilford Press. Retrieved from http//irhealthpsychology.com/files/site1/pages/Free_Books/acceptance_and_commitment_therapy.pdfRaymond, M. C., Brown, J. B. (2000). Experience of Fibromyalgia. QualitativeStudy. Canadian Family Physician, 46, 1100-1106. Retrieved from http//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2144885/pdf/canfamphys00027-0114.pdfCarson, J. W., Keefe, F. J., Lynch, T. R., Carson, K. M., Goli, V., Fras, A. M., Trop, S. R. (2005). Loving-kindness meditatio n for chronic low back pain. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 23(3), 287-304. DOI 10.1177/0898010105277651______________________________________________________________________________References 2.3Beutel, A. M., Marini, M. M. (1995). Gender and values. American Sociological Review, 60(3), 436-448. Retrieved from http//www.jstor.org/stable/2096423Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed.). Social, emotional, and personality development (Vol. 3, pp. 701-778). New York Wiley.Simon, R. W., Nath, L. E. (2004). Gender and emotion in the United States Do men and women differ in self reports of feelings or expressive behavior? American Journal of Sociology, 109, 1137-1176. Retrieved from http//www.fsu.edu/soc/people/simon/simon_gender.pdfGordon, A. K., Musher-Eizenman, D. R., Holub, S. C., Dalrymp, J. (2004). What are children thankful for? An archival analysis of gratitude before and after the attacks of September 11. Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 541-553. DOI10.1016/j.appdev.2004.08.004Kashdan, T. B., Mishra, A., Breen, W. E., Froh, J. J. (2009). Gender differences in gratitude Examining appraisals, narratives, the willingness to express emotions and changes in psychological needs. Journal of Personality, 77(3), 1-40. DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00562.xAdetunji, B., Adesida, A. A. (2008). Reconstructing masculinity and power in Africa through open exceed learning for sustainable development A critical analysis of Wole Soyinkas mode of fear. In C. I. Ofulue (General Ed.), T. T. Gefu., F. Gbenoba., F. K. Olakulehin., G. Olufemi (ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd ACDE conference and general assembly, (pp. 276-289). Victoria Island, Lagos.Brown, R. P. (2004). requital is mine Narcissism, vengeance, and the tendencyto forgive. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 576-584. DOI10.1016/j.jrp.2003.10.003McCullough,M.E., Bellah, G. C., Kilpatrick, S. D.,John son, J. L. (2001). vengefulnessRelationships with forgiveness, rumination, well-being, and theBig Five. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 601-610. Retrieved from http//www.psy.miami.edu/faculty/mmccullough/Papers/McCullough.pdfMiller, A. J., Worthington, E. L., Mcdaniel, M. A. (2008). Gender and forgiveness A meta-analytic review and research docket. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27(8), 843-876. Retrieved from http//www.people.vcu.edu/mamcdani/Publications/Miller,%20Worthington%20%20McDaniel%20(2008).pdfFehr, R., Gelfand, J., Nag, M. (2010). The road to forgiveness A meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 894-914. DOI 10.1037/a0019993References 2.2McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I., Thoresen, C. E. (2000). The psychology of forgiveness History, conceptual issues, and overview. In M.E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, C. E. Thoresen (Eds.) Forgiveness Theory, research and practice (pp. 1-14 ). New York Guilford Press.Worthington, E. L., Witvliet, C. V. O., Pietrini, P., Miller, A. J. (2007). Forgiveness, health and well being A review of evidence for emotional versus decisional forgiveness, dispositional forgivingness and reduced unforgiveness. Journals of Behavioral Medicine, 30, 291-302. DOI 10.1007/s10865-007-9105-8Fincham, F. D. (2010). Forgiveness intact to a science of close relationships? In M. Mikulincer P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions and behavior The better angels of our nature (pp. 347-365). Washington, DC, US.Worthington, E. L. Jr. (2005). More questions about forgiveness Research agenda for 2005-2015. In E. L. Worthington Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 557-575). New York Brunner-Routledge.Kearns, J.N., Fincham, F.D. (2005). Victim and perpetrator accounts of interpersonaltransgressions Self-serving or relationship-serving biases? Personality and Social PsychologyBulletin, 31, 321-333. DOI 10.1177/0146167204271594Scherbarth, A. J. (2007). Psychological abuse and health What role does forgiveness play? (Master dissertation). University of matrimony Texas. (Unpublished Thesis). Retrieved from http//digital.library.unt.edu/ark/67531/metadc3918/m2/1/high_res_d/thesis.pdf