Wednesday, February 20, 2019

Extra Tax on Fast Food Essay

now people always ar overweight or obese. A king-size reason of this is icteric forage like a Big Mac, beefburger etc. Too very much of any of those foot cause real health problems which a lot of people of the world today provide from. The real problem is why are people making these choices? Its simple, unhealthy food is cheaper than healthy food in many cases. Is it a good idea to introduce a immobile food tax, or do unhealthy food observe to remain cheap and take over of supererogatory tax?To start things off, I volition refer to this unhealthy food as prompting food. One problem with fast foods is that they are low in satiation value. That is, people dont tend to feel as full when they eat them, which can top off to overeating. An early(a) problem is that unhealthy food tends to replace other, more nutrient foods. When people are snacking on chips and cookies, they are usually not lade up on fruits and vegetables. Already you can tell this is quite a problem, but it can be chastend to some degree if we fig out the taxes on fast food.If the taxes are increased then people volition be opted to buy healthier foods such as vegetables or other nutrient rich foods without added sugar or sodium. They will no interminable be more expensive than the cheap, unhealthy, fast food. This in essence, will reduce the amount of unhealthy food that people will ingest. Another draw a bead on is that the extra tax on fast food will saves lives. centre disease is the second most common cause of death. Many lives could considerably be saved. As well as saving lives, reducing corpulency will alike improve the quality of life.The argument against a extra tax on fast food is that those on low incomes are more likely to consume unhealthy foods, therefore this tax will increase inequality. However, if a tax on fast food saves lives, we should not avoid implementing it just because it is the poor who will mostly benefit. If we are truly concerned about the im pact on equality, the revenue from a plump out tax can be targeted to the benefit of the poor. A increase in inequality need not occur from a fast food tax. Who is the government to tell people what to eat?If we want to eat spicy and fatty foods then let us eat this. The whole assign is people are still free to consume as much salty and fatty foods as they like. All in all it can be said that it is an unfair tax because fast food is poisonous for people who suffer obesity, shouldnt mean that everyone who enjoys the quick, cheap service fast food offers. People who are in a hurry or people short on cash may find fast food an ideal service, but if it is taxed due to obesity, then it will also affect people who arent obese.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.